
Planning a response structure
I need to provide a succinct explanation and then ask how to proceed. I'll start my answer with a quick overview and then add some context. After that, I’ll check the user's preference for how to proceed. I’ll also remember to keep it in a “Final answer structure” using bullets or short paragraphs, avoiding any heavy formatting. Conciseness is key here!
他说的是近来手球判罚的尺度——按现行标准(手臂“使身体不自然变大”、高于肩、阻挡射门线路等),很多并非故意的手球也会被判点球;再加上VAR放大细节,结果就是同类型球会被频繁判罚,给人“毫无逻辑”的感觉。
要不要我补充哪一块?
- 帮你查这段话的具体出处和他评论的是哪场比赛
- 梳理现行手球判罚要点与VAR介入原则(为何会增多)
- 做个简单数据对比:VAR前后、近几年五大联赛点球趋势
- 写一段简短的观点/社媒文案回应这条新闻 
你更关心哪一个?如果有具体比赛,请告诉我场次。
.gif)